A Treasury of Great Science Fiction, Vol 1, A Review By Jeff Powell
| Title: |
|
A Treasury Of Great Science Fiction, Vol 1 |
| Editor: |
|
Anthony Boucher |
| Capsule Review: |
|
 |
| Review Written: |
|
May 15, 2007 |
| Link To: |
|
dougshaw.com forum review |
This was a waste of time. I kept reading only out of the hope that
the next item in this anthology would be better. They really weren't.
And there is a second volume to this tome and I am not at all sure I
am going to bother trying to sled through it the way I did this one.
This anthology was compiled in the 1959 and mostly appears to contain
material published in the early 1950s. These pieces are almost all
very, very dated. Most are just plain poor in my opinion. They include:
- Re-Birth by John Wyndham. A short novel about a post atomic
apocalypse society. 125 pages of trudging predictability.
- The Shape Of Things That Came by Richard Deming. A short
story that might have been fascinating in 1950 but is
horribly out of place in 2007.
- Pillar Of Fire by Ray Bradbury. I know he's supposed to
be this god-like author, but this wasn't a winner for me.
And in fact, viewed with our sensibilities in 2007, he'd
probably be locked up for writing this now, particularly if
he wrote it as a kid or in college. It's basically a horror
story, though, set somewhere in the future, with a couple
mentions of rockets that probably caused people to think of
it as SF. Not in my definition, but...
- Waldo by Robert Heinlein. Now I know why mechanical
devices that manipulate items in place of people's hands
are called "waldoes", but beyond that there isn't anything
to recommend this novella. I've always had trouble with
Heinlein, but this is problematic in an entirely different
way from his later works. Waldo is boring. His
later works are patently offensive.
- The Father Thing by Philip K. Dick. Another horror
story; definitely not SF. I am starting to think that much
early SF was actually horror in disguise, and that renders it
much less interesting to me.
- The Children's Hour by Henry Kuttner and C. L. Moore.
This one borders on fantasy, rather than SF, and it's
a pretty dull tale of a relationship doomed to failure.
- Gomez by C. M. Kornbluth. A childish tale - though
perhaps not from the POV of 1953 or so - about someone
working out important atomic secrets on his own. Other
than enhancing my impression of the paranoia of the 1950s
about our atomic secrets, there's nothing of interest
here.
- The [Widget], the [Wadget], and Boff by Theodore
Sturgeon. This novella is probably the strongest entry in
the book. Again it bordered more on fantasy than SF,
but it was actually centered on a whole series of complex
relationships, and kept me interested as a result. Not
enough to re-read it, but it was OK.
- Sandra by George P. Elliott. I have no idea why this
was included in a volume of SF. I'd call it an alternate
history piece, I guess. The central idea is that slavery
still exists (the time of the story is not specified,
nor is it easy to determine from context) and the main
character presents in writing the development of the
relationship with his female slave. I found the entire
thing pointless and offensive.
- Beyond Space And Time by Joel Townsley Rogers. A
travesty of a hard SF story. I'd never heard of
Joel Townsley Rogers before reading this, and I hope I
never hear of him again. A quick google search tells me
that he was prolific. I'll continue to avoid him, and
if you're ever offered the chance to read this short story,
don't bother. It's the worst of the lot in this book.
- The Martian Crown Jewels by Poul Anderson. A rather
predictable pseudo-locked room mystery set in the future
and involving space travel. Yawn.
- The Weapon Shops Of Isher by A. E. van Vogt. An oddball
novella with some appeal, but I found it slow going for
reasons I am not entirely sure I understand. There are
a few interrelated plot lines and a reasonably well fleshed
out universe, but something seemed lacking.
And there you have it. Many of the giants of SF have pieces in
this collection, and my impression is mostly not good. To be honest,
the editor states that he was trying to "get together a great deal
of good reading in modern (1938-1950) s.f. which had been overlooked
by earlier anthologists". I suggest there is a reason these works
were overlooked.
As a sociological study, however, there is a tiny bit of interest
here. Female characters are scarce and female leads are even less
common, everyone smokes, and the predictions for the future are
mostly lame. None of those is a good reason to read this volume -
or these works in other locations - but if you were making a study
of just how far wrong SF can go, this might be an interesting place
to start.